Skip to content

Resource · Updated quarterly

eCommerce PPC benchmarks 2026.

Built from original data across Run The Numbers®'s portfolio of UK ecommerce Google Ads accounts. Measure your campaigns against real results, not industry averages pulled from thin air.

Last updated: April 2026 · Aggregate data across RTN's managed ecommerce accounts

Average ROAS by vertical

Median ROAS across managed accounts.

Ranges reflect the spread between accounts at different maturity stages. New accounts typically sit at the lower end. Accounts with 6+ months of optimisation and clean product feeds consistently hit the upper range.

  • Fashion and Apparel

    4x – 6x

    Shopping-heavy vertical. Feed quality and imagery drive the biggest variance between accounts.

  • Home and Garden

    5x – 8x

    Higher AOV products push ROAS up. Seasonal peaks (spring, Q4) can hit 10x+ with the right strategy.

  • Health and Beauty

    4x – 7x

    Repeat purchase rates help here. Subscription products and bundles consistently outperform single-item campaigns.

  • Sports and Outdoor

    6x – 10x

    Strong brand loyalty and high intent searches. Niche products with less competition regularly exceed 8x.

  • Food and Drink

    3x – 5x

    Lower AOV makes this the tightest vertical. Subscription models and hamper/gift products push toward the upper range.

Standard Shopping vs Performance Max

The biggest structural change in ecommerce ads.

Standard Shopping

ROAS
Typically 10-20% higher than PMax for mature, well-structured accounts.
Control
Full visibility on search terms, bid adjustments, and negative keywords.
Best for
Accounts with strong feed data, established conversion history, and need for granular reporting.
Weakness
Limited reach beyond Shopping placements. Requires more manual management.

Performance Max

ROAS
Competitive with Shopping once the algorithm has 6-8 weeks of data.
Control
Limited. Search term reporting is partial. Audience signals guide but don't control targeting.
Best for
Newer accounts, broad product catalogues, and brands wanting cross-channel reach.
Weakness
Can cannibalise brand traffic. Harder to diagnose performance drops.

The RTN approach: run both. Standard Shopping for top-performing product groups where maximum control matters, and Performance Max for broader catalogue coverage and new customer acquisition. The split depends on your catalogue size, margin structure, and growth goals.

Average CPC trends

What clicks cost in 2026.

CPC varies significantly by vertical, competition level, and campaign type. These ranges reflect what RTN sees across active UK accounts.

Vertical Shopping CPC Search CPC PMax CPC
Fashion and Apparel £0.18 – £0.35 £0.45 – £1.10 £0.22 – £0.50
Home and Garden £0.25 – £0.55 £0.60 – £1.40 £0.30 – £0.65
Health and Beauty £0.20 – £0.40 £0.50 – £1.20 £0.25 – £0.55
Sports and Outdoor £0.15 – £0.30 £0.40 – £0.90 £0.20 – £0.45
Food and Drink £0.12 – £0.28 £0.35 – £0.85 £0.18 – £0.40

CPCs have risen 6-13% year on year across most verticals, driven by increased competition and Google's shift toward AI-powered bidding. The accounts that resist this inflation are the ones with strong feed quality scores and tight negative keyword management.

The feed optimisation impact

The single highest-ROI activity in ecommerce PPC.

Your product feed is the foundation of every Shopping and Performance Max campaign. Poor feed data means poor results, regardless of how clever your bidding strategy is. Here's what RTN sees when feeds get rebuilt through proper product feed optimisation.

Before feed optimisation

3.2x

Average ROAS across accounts before feed rebuild. Titles are auto-generated, descriptions are thin, custom labels non-existent.

After feed optimisation

4.3x

After optimised titles, enriched descriptions, strategic custom labels, and proper GTIN/brand mapping. A 34% improvement from feed changes alone.

Feed optimisation costs nothing in additional ad spend and improves every campaign that touches your product data. If you haven't had a professional feed audit, you're leaving performance on the table.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions on the data.

  • How often are these benchmarks updated?

    Quarterly. Each refresh pulls from the latest 90 days of performance across the managed accounts. Outlier months like Black Friday are excluded so the figures reflect sustainable, repeatable performance rather than seasonal spikes.

  • How many accounts is this data based on?

    Data is aggregated across every active managed ecommerce account in the portfolio. Exact account numbers aren't disclosed for client confidentiality, but the figures represent a meaningful sample of UK ecommerce businesses across the verticals shown.

  • My ROAS is below these benchmarks. What should I do?

    Start with a Free Audit. RTN will look at your account structure, feed quality, search term reports, and conversion tracking to identify where the gaps are. Most audited accounts have at least one significant issue suppressing ROAS, and it's usually fixable within the first 30 days.

  • Do these benchmarks include brand traffic?

    No. Brand campaigns artificially inflate ROAS figures and make comparisons meaningless. All benchmarks here are non-brand only, covering generic Shopping, Search, and Performance Max campaigns. If someone quotes you a 15x ROAS without specifying brand versus non-brand, ask questions.

  • Are these benchmarks relevant to my business size?

    The client base ranges from £1,000 to £30,000 monthly ad spend. Benchmarks apply most directly to businesses in that range. Enterprise accounts with six-figure monthly budgets operate in a different competitive environment and should benchmark differently.

See how your campaigns measure up.

Benchmarks give you a reference point. They don't tell you what's wrong with your specific account. Book a Free Audit and find out where you stand against these figures.

Get my Free Audit